1. Vandeweyer, D. Biological contaminants in insects as food and feed / D. Vandeweyer, J. De Smet, N. Van Loovere, L. Van Campenhout // Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. – 2021. – V. 7 (5). – P. 807–822. DOI: 10.3920/JIFF2020.0060.
2. Elorduy, R.B.J. The importance of edible insects in the nutrition and economy of people of the rural areas of Mexico / R.B.J. Elorduy // Ecology of Food and Nutrition. – 1997. – V. 36 (5). – P. 347–366. DOI: 10.1080/03670244.1997.9991524.
3. XiaoMin, C. Review of the nutritive value of edible insects / C. XiaoMin, F. Ying, Z. Hong, C. ZhiYong // Asia-Pacific resources and their potential for development, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2008. – P. 85–92.
4. Электронный ресурс. – Режим доступа [https://prezero.us/]. Дата обращения: 13.05.2022.
Electronic resource. – Access mode [https://prezero.us/]. Date of access: 13.05.2022.
5. Электронный ресурс. – Режим доступа [https://www.enviroflight.net]. Дата обращения: 13.05.2022.
Electronic resource. – Access mode [https://www.enviroflight.net]. Date of access: 13.05.2022.
6. Электронный ресурс. – Режим доступа [https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/en]. Дата обращения: 13.05.2022.
Electronic resource. – Access mode [https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/en]. Date of access: 13.05.2022.
7. Favre, D. Mobile phone-induced honeybee worker piping / D. Favre // Apidologie. – 2011. – V. 42. – P. 270–279. DOI: 10.1007/s13592–011–0016-x.
8. Harst, W. Can electromagnetic exposure cause a change in behaviour? Studying possible non-thermal influences on honeybees – an approach within the framework of educational informatics / W. Harst, J. Kuhn, H. Stever // Acta Syst IIAS Int J. – 2006. – V. (1). – P. 1–6.
9. Lázaro, A. Electromagnetic radiation of mobile telecommunication antennas affects the abundance and composition of wild pollinators / A. Lázaro, A. Chroni, T. Tscheulin, J. Devalez, C. Matsoukas, T. Petanidou // Journal of Insect Conservation. – 2016. – V. 20. – P. 315–324. DOI: 10.1007/s10841–016–9868–8.
10. Pereira, M.C. Can altered magnetic field affect the foraging behaviour of ants? / M.C. Pereira, I.D.C. Guimarães, D. Acosta-Avalos, W.F. Antonialli Junior // PLoS One. – 2019. – V. 14 (11). – e0225507. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225507.
11. Balmori, A. Electromagnetic radiation as an emerging driver factor for the decline of insects / A. Balmori // Science of the Total Environment. – 2021. – V. 767. – Р. 144913. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144913.
12. Cammaerts, M.-C. Food collection and response to pheromones in an ant species exposed to electromagnetic radiation / M.-C. Cammaerts, Z. Rachidi, F. Bellens, P. De Doncker // Electromagnetic biology and medicine. – 2013. – V. 32. – P. 315–332. DOI: 10.3109/15368378.2012.712877.
13. Vargová, B. Ticks and radio-frequency signals: behavioural response of ticks (Dermacentor reticulatus) in a 900 MHz electromagnetic field / B. Vargová, J. Kurimský, R. Cimbala, M. Kosterec, I. Majláth, N. Pipová, P. Tryjanowski, Ł. Jankowiak, V. Majláthová // Systematic and Applied Acarology. – 2017. – V. 22. – P. 683–693. DOI: 10.11158/saa.22.5.7.
14. Shepherd, S. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields impair the cognitive and motor abilities of honey bees / S. Shepherd, M.A.P. Lima, E.E. Oliveira, S.M. Sharkh, C.W. Jackson, P.L. Newland // Sci Rep. – 2018. – V. 8 (1). P. 1–9. DOI: 10.1038/s41598–018–26185-y.
15. Lupi, D. Effects of pesticides and electromagnetic fields on honeybees: a field study using biomarkers / D. Lupi, P. Tremolada, M. Colombo, R. Giacchini, R. Benocci, P. Parenti, M. Parolini, G. Zambon, M. Vighi // International Journal of Environmental Research. – 2020. – V. 14. – P. 107–122. DOI: 10.1007/s41742–019–00242–4.
16. Erdoğan, Y. Effect of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) and Electric Field (EF) on Some Behavior of Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) / Y. Erdoğan, M.M. Cengiz // bioRxiv, 2019. DOI: 10.1101/608182.
17. Kirschvink, J.L. Magnetite-based magnetoreception / J.L. Kirschvink, M.M. Walker, C. Diebel // Curr Opin Neurobiol. – 2001. – V. 11. – P. 462–467. DOI: 10.1016/S0959–4388(00)00235-X.
18. Wajnberg, E. Magnetoreception in eusocial insects: an update / E. Wajnberg, D. Acosta-Avalos, O.C. Alves, J.F. de Oliviera, R.B. Srygley, D.M. Esquivel // J R Soc Interface. – 2010. – V. 7. – P. 207–225. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0526.focus.
19. Válková, T. How do honeybees use their magnetic compas? Can they see the North? / T. Válková, M. Vácha // Bull Entomol Res. – 2012. – V. 102. – P. 461–467. DOI: 10.1017/S0007485311000824.
20. Balmori, A. Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as an emerging threat to wildlife orientation / A. Balmori // Sci. Total Environ. – 2015. – V. 518–519. – P. 58–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.077.
21. Vácha, M. Radio-frequency magnetic fields disrupt magnetoreception in American cockroach / M. Vácha, T. Půžová, M. Kvíćalová // J. Exp Biol. – 2009. – V. 212. – P. 3473–3477. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.028670.
22. Cammaerts, M.-C. Ants can be used as bioindicators to reveal biological effects of electromagnetic waves from some wireless apparatus / M.-C. Cammaerts, O. Johansson // Electromagn Biol Med. – 2014. – V. 33. – P. 282–288. DOI: 10.3109/15368378.2013.817336.
23. Cammaerts, M.-C. Effect of short-term GSM radiation at representative levels in society on a biological model: the ant Myrmica sabuleti / M.-C. Cammaerts, G.A.E. Vandenbosch, V. Volski // J. Insect Behav. – 2014. – V. 27. – P. 514–526. DOI: 10.1007/s10905–014–9446–4.
24. Cammaerts, M.-C. GSM 900 MHz radiation inhibits ants’ association between food sites and encountered cues / M.-C. Cammaerts, P. De Doncker, X. Patris, F. Bellens, Z. Rachidi, D. Cammaerts // Electromagn Biol Med. – 2012. – V. 31. – P. 151–165. DOI: 10.3109/15368378.2011.624661.
25. Lopatina, N.G. Effect of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation on behavior of the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae) / N.G. Lopatina, T.G. Zachepilo, N.G. Kamyshev, N.A. Dyuzhikova, I.N. Serov // Entomological Review. – 2019. – V. 99. – P. 24–29. DOI: 10.1134/S0013873819010032.
26. Atli, E. The effects of microwave frequency electromagnetic fields on the development of Drosophila melanogaster / E. Atli, H. Ünlü // Int J. Radiat Biol. – 2006. – V. 82. – P. 435–441. DOI: 10.1080/09553000600798849.
27. Maharjan, R. Effects of radiofrequency on the development and performance of Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) on three different leguminous seeds / R. Maharjan, H. Yi, J. Ahn, G.H. Roh, C. Park, Y. Yoon, S. Bae // Appl Entomol Zool. – 2019. – V. 54 (3). – P. 255–266. DOI: 10.1007/s13355–019–00621–5.
28. Maharjan, R. Oviposition preference and development of Maruca vitrata (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on different radiofrequency fields / R. Maharjan, S. Bae, G.H. Kim, Y. Yoon, Y. Jang, Y. Kim, H. Yi // Entomological Research. – 2019. – V. 49 (5). – P. 214–222. DOI: 10.1111/1748–5967.12349.
29. Maharjan, R. Artificial radiofrequency driven life-table parameters of perilla seed bugs (Nysius sp.) (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) / R. Maharjan, Y. Yoon, Y. Jang, M. Jeong, T.W. Jung, H.S. Cho, H. Yi // J. Asia Pac Entomol. – 2020. – V. 23 (4). – P. 1264–1271. DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2020.10.011.
30. Stanojević, V. Effects of extremely low frequency (50 Hz) magnetic field on development dynamics of the housefly (Musca domestica L.) / V. Stanojević, Z. Prolić, T. Savić, D. Todorović, B. Janać // Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. – 2005. – V. 24 (2). – P. 99–107. DOI: 10.1080/15368370500205464.
31. Odemer, R. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMF) on honey bee queen development and mating success / R. Odemer, F. Odemer // Sci Total Environ. – 2019. – V. 661. – P. 553–562. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.154.
32. Yoshii, T. Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity of drosophila’s circadian clock / T. Yoshii, M. Ahmad, C. Helfrich-Foerster // PLoS Biol. – 2009. – V. 7. – P. 0813–0819. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000086.
33. Fedele, G. Genetic analysis of circadian responses to low frequency electromagnetic fields in Drosophila melanogaster / G. Fedele, M.D. Edwards, S. Bhutani, J.M. Hares, M. Murbach, E.W. Green, S. Dissel, H.M. Hastings, E. Rosato, C.P. Kyriacou // PLoS Genet. – 2014. – V. 10. – e1004804. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004804.
34. Bartos, P. Weak radiofrequency fields affect the insect circadian clock / P. Bartos, R. Netusil, P. Slaby, D. Dolezel, T. Ritz, M. Vacha // J. R. Soc Interface. – 2019. – V. 16 (158). – Р. 20190285. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0285.
35. Panagopoulos, D.J. The effect of exposure duration on the biological activity of mobile telephony radiation / D.J. Panagopoulos, L.H. Margaritis // Mutat Res. – 2010. – V. 699. – P. 17–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.04.010.
36. Panagopoulos, D.J. Effect of GSM 900-MHz mobile phone radiation on the reproductive capacity of Drosophila melanogaster / D.J. Panagopoulos, A. Karabarbounis, L.H. Margaritis // Electromagn Biol Med. – 2004. – V. 23. – P. 29–43. DOI: 10.1081/JBC-120039350.
37. Panagopoulos, D.J. Cell death induced by GSM 900-MHz and DCS 1800-MHz mobile telephony radiation / D.J. Panagopoulos, E.D. Chavdoula, I.P. Nezis, L.H. Margaritis // Mutat Res. – 2007. – V. 626. – P. 69–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.008.
38. Panagopoulos, D.J. Bioeffects of mobile telephony radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna / D.J. Panagopoulos, E.D. Chavdoula, L.H. Margaritis // Int. J. Radiat Biol. – 2010. – V. 86. – P. 345–357. DOI: 10.3109/09553000903567961.
39. Chavdoula, E.D. Comparison of biological effects between continuous and intermittent exposure to GSM-900-MHz mobile phone radiation: detection of apoptotic cell-death features / E.D. Chavdoula, D.J. Panagopoulus, L.H. Margaritis // Mutat Res. – 2010. – V. 700. – P. 51–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.05.008.
40. Atli, E. The effects of microwave frequency electromagnetic fields on the fecundity of Drosophila melanogaster / E. Atli, H. Ünlü // Turkish J Biol. – 2007. – V. 31. – P. 1–5. DOI: 10.1080/09553000600798849.
41. Weisbrot, D. Effects of mobile phone radiation on reproduction and development in Drosophila melanogaster / D. Weisbrot, H. Lin, L. Ye, M. Blank, R. Goodman // J. Cell Biochem. – 2003. – V. 89. – P. 48–55. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.10480.
42. Vijver, M.G. Investigating short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields on reproductive capacity of invertebrates in the field situation / M.G. Vijver, J.F.B. Bolte, T.R. Evans, W.L.M. Tamis, W.J.G.M. Peijnenburg, C.J.M. Musters, G.R. de Snoo // Electromagn Biol Med. – 2013. – V. 33 (1). – P. 21–28. DOI: 10.3109/15368378.2013.783846.
43. Kumar, N.R. Biochemical changes in haemolymph of Apis mellifera L. drone under the influence of cell phone radiations / N.R. Kumar, N. Rana, P. Kalia // Journal of Applied and Natural Science. – 2013. – V. 5. – P. 139–141. DOI: 10.31018/jans.v5i1.296.
44. Lima, F. Effects of radiation technologies on food nutritional quality / F. Lima, K. Vieira, M. Santos, P.M. de Souza // Descriptive food science. – 2018. – P. 1–17. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80437.
45. Munir, M.T. Control of foodborne biological hazards by ionizing radiations / M.T. Munir, M.M. Federighi // Foods. – 2020. – V. 9 (7). – P. 878–901. DOI: 10.3390/foods9070878
46. Sarcan, E.T. Ionizing radiation and its effects on pharmaceuticals / E.T. Sarcan, A.Y. Ozer // Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. – 2020. – V. 323. – P. 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s10967–019–06954–3.
47. Adebo, O.A. A review on novel non-thermal food processing techniques for mycotoxin reduction / O.A. Adebo, A.B. Oyedeji, S. Gbashi, M.A. Adefisoye, O.M. Ogundele // International Journal of Food Science and Technology. – 2021. – V. 56 (1). – P. 13–27. DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.14734.
48. Akhila, P.P. Application of electromagnetic radiations for decontamination of fungi and mycotoxins in food products: A comprehensive review / P.P. Akhila, K.V. Sunooj, B. Aaliya, M. Navaf, C. Sudheesh, S. Sabu, A. Sasidharan, S.A. Mir, J. George, A.M. Khaneghah // Trends in Food Science and Technology. – 2021. – V. 114. – P. 399–409. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.013.
49. Chen, Y. Evaluation of the extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) on growth of bacteria Escherichia coli / Y. Chen, Z.Z. Cai, Q. Feng, P. Gao, Y. Yang, X. Bai, B.Q. Tang // Biol Eng Med. – 2019. – V. 4. – P. 1–6. DOI: 10.15761/BEM.1000169.
50. Del Re, B. Extremely low frequency magnetic fields affect transposition activity in Escherichia coli / B. Del Re, F. Garoia, P. Mesirca, C. Agostini, F. Bersani, G. Giorgi // Radiat Environ Biophys. – 2003. – V. 42 (2). – P. 113–118. DOI: 10.1007/s00411–003–0192–9.
51. Ahmed, I. Evaluation of the effects of Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) on survival of the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus / I. Ahmed, T. Istivan, I. Cosic, E. Pirogova // EPJ Nonlinear Biomed Phys. – 2013. – V. 1. – P. 1–17. DOI: 10.1140/epjnbp12.
52. Garuba, E.O. Evaluation of the effects of sound exposure and low field electromagnetism on growth and antibiotics susceptibility of some microorganisms / E.O. Garuba, O.M. Ajunwa, A.N. Ibrahim King // Bulletin of the National Research Centre. – 2021. – V. 45. – Article number: 216. DOI: 10.1186/s42269–021–00674-z.
53. Tessaro, L.W.E. Bacterial growth rates are influenced by cellular characteristics of individual species when immersed in electromagnetic fields / L.W.E. Tessaro, N.J. Murugan, M.A. Persinger // Microbiological Research. – 2015. – V. 172. – P. 26–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2014.12.008.
54. Salmen, S.H. Evaluation of Effect of High Frequency Electromagnetic Field on Growth and Antibiotic Sensitivity of Bacteria / S.H. Salmen, S.A. Alharbi, A.A. Faden, M. Wainwright // Saudi J. Biol Sci. – 2018. – V. 25 (1). – P. 105–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.07.006.
55. Beretta, G. The effects of electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields on microorganisms in the perspective of bioremediation / G. Beretta, A.F. Mastorgio, L. Pedrali, S. Saponaro, E. Sezenna // Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. – 2019. – V. 18. – P. 29–75. DOI: 10.1007/s11157–018–09491–9.
56. Liu, X. Dynamic changes of nutrient composition throughout the entire life cycle of black soldier fly / X. Liu, X. Chen, H. Wang, Q. Yang, K. ur Rehman, W. Li, M. Cai, Q. Li, L. Mazza, J. Zhang, Z. Yu, L. Zheng // PLoS ONE. – 2017. – V. 12 (8). – e0182601. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182601.